Skip to content

Conversation

@badasahog
Copy link
Contributor

It was actually about a 50/50 split, so this should make code more consistent.

closes #7395

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.13%. Comparing base (bc7f5af) to head (21bcb94).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7399   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.13%   99.13%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines       16610    16610           
=======================================
  Hits        16466    16466           
  Misses        144      144           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jangorecki
Copy link
Member

jangorecki commented Oct 28, 2025

So far, the conclusion from the discussion on this issue is not to proceed with the change. The change would affect the history of 34 files, and it doesn’t seem necessary. It would be nice if the style were consistent, but it isn’t, and as long as it is not less readable, then I don't think there is anything to solve here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent use of newline before braces on functions

3 participants